Kids Corner

Daily Fix

Questions Begging for Answers

T. SHER SINGH

 

 

 




It had taken a long time for the rigid mind-set of our gurdwara committees to get around to accepting the fact that those amongst us who are incapacitated or limited in their movements by age, illness or infirmity, need to be accorded special accommodation in the gurdwaras so that they too remain an active part of the sangat.

It took a few years, but it had reached the point when it had become an accepted practice all-around: those who were wheel-chair bound could now wheel themselves, or be wheeled, into Guru’s presence, pay their obeisance, and then park themselves behind the sangat, at the periphery of the hall, next to benches or low chairs already provided for those who were unable to sit down on the floor cross-legged, because of age, illness or infirmity.

And then, the bomb-shell.

A few days ago, the jathedars of the Akal Takht announced their decree that gurdwaras around the world are not to allow any chairs or benches -- and therefore, wheelchairs -- inside diwan halls. That is, those who cannot sit on the floor, can now only be parked outside the hall. Out of sight.

I have struggled with this news, but not because I’m ambivalent about it; I’m not. I’m quite sure of exactly where I stand on this issue -- and I’m sure most of Sikhdom is with me.

But I’m also deferential to the Akal Takht. It is dear to us, and we have historically turned to it for guidance and leadership since its establishment by Guru Hargobind, the Sixth Master.
 
So am I most respectful of the position and role of the jathedars. The posts have not always been occupied by the best of men, just as those who have been appointed Pope in Rome have, more often than not, disappointed both God and Man.

[This in no way is to suggest that the role of the pope and that of the jathedars are analogous in any manner or to any degree whatsoever. The pope is the highest priest in the Catholic heirarchy. We, on the other hand, have NO priesthood. Our jathedars have NO spiritual authority or role over Sikhs. Period.]

But I’m willing to give them -- alas, once again -- the benefit of the doubt. Not because of who they are, but the positions they hold, and where they sit. As caretakers and custodians of our institutions.

For some reason, I’m reminded of Mark Antony and his address to the grieving crowd gathered around Julius Caesar’s body. I desperately seek inspiration from his words, but particularly invoke his wonderful sense of restraint and self-control.

For the jathedar -- Gyani Gurbachan Singh -- too is an “honourable man; so are they all, all honourable men … ”

Surely, they have thought this one out -- thoroughly. They must know something we do not know, some nugget of wisdom to which we haven’t been privy.

Because we are not gyanis, maybe?

Therefore, I’ll bite my tongue, and hold my torrent of thoughts, and resort to only seeking answers from them.

I have a slew of questions. Answers, any answers, to some or all of them, are urgently needed.

To assuage our concerns.

I address my questions to Gyani Gurbachan Singh, and all the other jathedars who were, or should’ve been, involved in the process. It is their answers that I, nay, the entire Sikh Nation, seek anxiously. And urgently.

To begin with, how did you arrive at this momentous decision?

How long did you study this issue?

What research did you commission prior to making your decision? By whom?

What community submissions did you invite and receive? From whom?

How much do you know about the laws of civilized lands where many of us live, where it is required by the state to give full and easy access to wheelchairs, for example, to all areas and facilities where the public is invited or uses?

Have you obtained exemptions from the respective governments?

If not, who will pay the fines and bear the penalties brought about by the breaking of those laws? Do you have a legal team ready to fly away to far corners to defend your edict? And the funds to reimburse the cost incurred locally, as a result?

Taking the Harmandar Sahib in Amritsar as an example: if wheelchairs are not allowed into the inner sanctuary, then where ARE they allowed? To the threshold of the Harmandar? Can the wheelchairs come all the way down the causeway to the door? Where will they park?

Or do you want them to stay outside, on the parkarma?

Does that mean, once a Sikh loses the use of his knees or legs -- due to age, illness, infirmity, accident, war, or any kind of mishap, he loses the right to pay his/her respects within the Guru’s Darbar?

Does the same hold for every other gurdwara in the world?

Or have you made arrangements for your sevadaars to physically carry those amongst us who have lost personal mobility and/or strength, into the sanctuary? Are they then to be whisked out immediately? Or do you expect the children of those in need of help to do this chore?

Have any of you ever done this with your own loved ones? Will you please give it a try … this week?

Since you have already mandated that all Sikh marriages take place in a gurdwara, does that mean that the elders and the physically-challenged in the family are prohibited from attending the wedding, other than by sitting in the corridor outside … somewhere?

How old are you guys anyway?

Do each of you sit on the floor at home? Sleep on the floor? If you use chairs and sofas and beds, why do you do so?

Is it that you have decreed that Waheguru is only inside a gurdwara, and nowhere else?

Have you read the saakhi of Guru Nanak in Mecca? Do you understand its import?

Don't you have mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandparents, around? Elderly brothers and sisters? Friends? Are any of them ’birad’ -- that is old or ill or confined to limited mobility? Have you banished them all from the presence of the Guru Granth Sahib? Or do you carry them each, in and out, for a quick darshan? Every day? Once a year? 

Have any of you ever been sick and hospitalized? Have you used a hospital bed or do you bounce down to the floor when doing your nitnem in the hospital? Or do you skip doing nitnem altogether when in hospital?

How about when you’re in an aeroplane, a train, a bus, a car … during a long journey? No nitnem along the way? Or do you stop along the way, pull out a prayer mat, face towards Amritsar, sit down on the floor and do your patth?

*    *   *   *   *

I’ll stop here for now. I and many others may have some more questions later, but first, we eagerly await your answers. Not in weeks, not in months, but in days.

NOT LATER THAN THIS WEEK, PLEASE. Why? Because time is of the essence.

In the meantime, my dear mother will continue to sit on a low chair while doing paatth before the Guru Granth Sahib.

And, more … here’s something you need to know.
 
Last night I was in a gurdwara for a service.

The sangat there was aware of your ‘edict’.

There were over a hundred in the sangat. Over the course of the entire evening, no more than a total of 5 or 6 availed of the benches at the back. Not because they were seeking luxury, but because they could not have stayed in the Guru’s attendance if the furniture had not been specially made available for them. They sat through the whole 3-hour service in deep reverence and contemplation … unlike some of us who are younger and fully ‘able’.

I checked. There are no plans to remove the benches.

*   *   *   *   *

Finally, while you provide us the transparency of your actions, here’s a thought:

Guru Amar Das, the third master, lived to the age of 95 ... having been named Guru at the age of 73. He further entrenched the institutions of langar, pangat and sangat as inspired and initiated by Guru Nanak. Amroo Nithaawaa(n) -- the homeless one -- he was called, before he became Guru.

In proclaiming him the Third Master, Guru Angad, his predecessor, praised his life-work by showering him the following honorifics: “Thou art the Home to the homeless … the Support to those who have no support … the Crutch to those who need a crutch … the source of Respect to those who receive no respect …“

Just wanted to remind you of Him. Lest you forgot … I know your plate is full, and that you have many, many important things to do as jathedars. But …

*   *   *   *   *   *

I will leave it to our readers to ensure that those who need to see and read these questions, indeed get to do so. You have our permission to translate this article into Punjabi, if it is necessary to facilitate the process, and to republish it and/or circulate it wherever and howsoever to pursue our goal for full transparency.

 

December 2, 2013
 

Conversation about this article

1: M. Kaur (Fredrick, Maryland, U.S.A.), December 02, 2013, 11:14 AM.

These are very crucial questions that we all need answers to from the SGPC. To alienate our elders should not be acceptable under any circumstances; they are our core and it's our duty to have them join the Guru's darbar. I definitely see myself in this predicament in a few years when I am unable to sit crossed legged on the floor. Will I then have to give up the darshan of the Guru and to be part of the saadh sangat, because of the diktat? I vividly remember an incident that occurred at Harmandar Sahib on one of my recent visits; a young man with homemade crutches arrived to pay his respects. He had a wound on his left leg, the knee below was bandaged heavily. He was waiting in the line to go in when two sevadaars pulled him aside and said he couldn't go in to mattha tek due to his bandage and crutches. This man was pleading with his hands joined and asking permission to go forward and the two sevadaars were not relenting. Instead, they started beating him with their lathis and some other members of the sangat had to carry out the poor man out of the parkarma. So if this is the instruction given to the employees of Darbar Sahib, then that means no injured person can enter the Guru's darbar? On what basis are these instructions created? How can you discriminate against the sangat when Guru Nanak created us as equal? Is the Guru's darbar for the young and fit only?

2: Chintan Singh (San Jose, California, USA), December 02, 2013, 12:51 PM.

Sher, your questions written in a sarcastic and humorous manner brought a smile to my face on a subject on which we all should be otherwise weeping. Just like you, I too am giving the benefit of the doubt to the respected jathedars, hoping that they thoroughly thought through this decision and have some good reasons for it. Your piece should be converted to a hard-copy letter by all gurdwaras and Sikh institutions and sent to Jathedar Sahib on behalf of their respective sangats. I am going to present it to our local gurdwara management committee members and request them to do so.

3: Harman Singh (California, USA), December 02, 2013, 2:20 PM.

Every sikh should seek his own answers to these and any other questions in the Guru Granth, our spiritual Teacher. The jathedars will disappoint, for they are not only human, but tied down by the political mileue of India and Punjab. There is something valuable about the concept of separation of church and state in the West. In Sikhism, the two were never really separate - the wisdom of the "church" was supposed to guide the affairs of the "state," not the other way around.

4: R Singh  (Canada), December 02, 2013, 2:48 PM.

Theirs is an assault on the Sikhs themselves, while we keep according these people our misplaced respect by virtue of their occupation. The wedding edict should have been a dead giveaway, that more were on the way, as they have confirmed now. What they did to Prof Darshan Singh is of course no secret, and the violence against the management of a gurdwara where he was invited to speak, is still fresh in our minds. Now our old and infirm are to be left open for assaults. When do Sikhs get up and say enough is enough?

5: Rup Singh (Canada), December 02, 2013, 6:38 PM.

Important questions that won't be and can't be answered by these incompetent sell-offs. They are making an anti-Sikhi decision for the Sikhs. How did we end up in this state? The SGPC always does things to further divide and alienate the sangat. Seems that they are on a mission to destroy Sikh history and heritage, and slowly erode the significance of Sikh institutions and values. It's time for the sangat to stop filling their coffers. But when you have a waiting list of 10 years or more for akhand paatths at the Dukh Bhanjani Beri alone, well isn't the sangat part of the problem and must share some of the blame too?

6: Irvinderpal Singh Babra (Brampton, Ontario, Canada), December 02, 2013, 10:28 PM.

I can say that our respected jathedars are behaving like "jallads", barbarians, and doing something which is clearly against our Sikh religion. Wheelchair-bound devotees enhance our religion, and they cannot be stopped within the Golden Temple or beyond. And that it is our own Sikh leaders that are doing this is simply beyond comprehension. Our Sikh religion is for all, it is unmatched, unparalleled, kind and loving ... our job is to make life easier for the disabled, the frail and elderly who seek the Grus's grace.

7: Irvinderpal Singh Babra (Brampton, Ontario, Canada), December 02, 2013, 10:35 PM.

Sher has done a great job in bringing the rights of the wheelchair bound sangat members before the quom.

8: Manjeet Singh  (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), December 03, 2013, 1:41 AM.

The jathedars are at it again. They have an uncanny ability to stir up unnecessary dust. Probably to hide away their incompetence. Instead of leading the panth in matters temporal, they come up with rulings that make more noise than sense. It is the elderly and the infirm who need benches to sit in gurdwaras. And more often than not, this group listens intently to the bani being sung or read in the gurdwaras. I think it is a sin to physically hamper anyone in his effort to get closer to the Guru.

9: Sangat Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), December 03, 2013, 7:10 AM.

After having been declared the rightful successor to the Guruship, Guru Teg Bahadar proceeded to pay his homage at the Harmandar Sahib. He was not allowed to enter the Golden Temple by the custodians, who happened to be his close relatives; they refused to acknowledge his authority as the Eighth Master. However, Guru Teg Bahadar did not assert his authority as Guru to enter the Harmandar ... The times haven't changed. The jathedars are today's mahants.

10: Manjeet Singh  (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), December 03, 2013, 7:17 AM.

The Hindu pandas who refused to allow Bhagat Namdev ji into the mandir were no different. They felt Bhagat Namdev ji was not of the right caste. They rudely pushed him out. And lo! The story goes that the Lord physically turned the whole mandir towards where Namdev ji was sitting. There are at least five shabads in the Guru Granth Sahib which bear testimony to this. Looks like the jathedars need to study the Guru Granth Sahib more closely. This mandir (from the Bhagat Namdev story) known as the Aunda Nag Mandir still stands in Maharashtra state as silent testimony against those who seek to exclude sincere devotees from worship, for whatever reason.

11: Talwinder Singh (USA), December 03, 2013, 7:28 AM.

Maybe it is the sense of spirit that is getting weak in the community. Walk into a langar hall with chairs for the handicapped and you will invariably notice some healthy folks on the chairs. We need to be considerate for the weak who really need assistance but at the same time have a chardi kala spirit for all. When (at least) in Guru's presence it should be in absolute submission to the will of the almighty Waheguru. A community that knows how to give heads to the Guru without questions, is now finding ways to be in Guru's presence at their "convenience".

12: Sukhdev Singh Randhawa (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), December 03, 2013, 10:32 AM.

My heart bleeds at the decree and the immense pain it has already caused to our fellow Sikhs, young and old, who for an infinite variety of reasons are unable to be in the Guru's presence. For someone like me who is less familiar with the Guru Granth Sahib, as compared to my other brothers and sisters who have expressed their views lucidly, in my hurt I have the following queries: (i) For a progressive religion like Sikhism at the heart of which is the central message of love and empathy for all humanity, why have a select group of Sikhs who arrogate to themselves the power to bar the old and infirm from the Guru's presence; and (ii) Is the said group of misguided souls aware that presently all over the world efforts are being made to ensure that the handicapped are able to move around freely "all over" while the caretaker/custodians of our institutions are seeking to prohibit their fellow Sikhs from the Guru's presence in our gurdwaras? Furthermore, what message/signs are we sending to the rest of the world and is that consistent with what the Guru Granth teaches us? Shame on us all if we are unable to get the decree rescinded.

13: Harinder Pal Singh (Patiala, Punjab), December 03, 2013, 12:08 PM.

Time to revolt against the very institution of jathedari. In any case, they are political appointees picking up the perks thrown by powers that be. Hit the golak chors where it hurts them most. Let's resolve not to offer money at their gurdwaras for one month, but instead give the money directly to the cause we cherish. Harsh though it may sound, it's the way it is. Stupid edicts need a harsh response.

14: A.S.P. (Nottingham, United Kingdom), December 03, 2013, 2:57 PM.

Maybe we need another Gurdwara Reform Movement. If our leaders behave in this manner, denying sangat to elderly and disabled gursikhs, then what other option is there?

15: Ravinder Singh Khalsa (Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.), December 03, 2013, 4:03 PM.

Here are the emails addresses. For the "President" of the SGPC: president@sgpc.net -- and the Shiromani Akali Dal: contact@shiromaniakalidal.org.in ... I couldn't find direct emails for the Badals or Gurbachan Singh.

16: Gurjender Singh (Maryland, USA), December 03, 2013, 8:24 PM.

The main reason behind all these problems is that all the gurdwara managements are afraid to speak out or write to the Akal Takht. They are clueless, and so are those who act on the strength of their silence.

17: S Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), December 04, 2013, 3:05 AM.

I am no great lover of the jathedars, and care even less for their politics. But I am going to hazard a guess as to the cause of their decree: by the Akal Takht taking a harsh and extreme stand, then only will we be moderate in the type of seating arrangement we make in the Darbar Sahib for our beloved ones who are unable to sit on the floor. They could be thinking that perhaps we will put in oversized sofas and swivel armchairs, but with an extreme decree like this, we will exercise better discretion and sparsely furnish the peripheral walls of our humble darbars with modest benches.

18: H. Kaur (Canada), December 04, 2013, 4:06 AM.

When a people are controlled by a group which does not wish them well but the worst, their institutions are also controlled and used against them much like the cells of the body controlled by viruses which work for the viruses rather than the body of the host.I just hope all Sikhs realize that we are not in a position to waste our energy on fighting about theological issues or even other issues when there are people trying to get away after butchering hundreds of thousands of us and attacking dozens and dozens of our gurdwaras and still not letting us rebuild them.

19: Baldev Singh (Bradford, United Kingdom), December 04, 2013, 8:44 AM.

As someone who encounters these 'Sikhs' at the Darbar Sahib regularly, it is obvious that cushy jobs and money have precedence over Sikh ethics or Code of Conduct or compassion! Firstly, all contentious issues need to be removed from Sikhism! Sikhism is liberation, not further incarceration! The able bodied Sikhs only attach themselves to gurdwaras for the langar! I've noticed when there's no langar, there is no Sangat! We wouldn't need anyone to tell us how to live our lives if we simply followed the values of Guru Nanak-Gobind Singh. Then, we would not have to quarrel over differences which we should not have in the first place if we respect the Guru!

20: R Singh (Canada), December 05, 2013, 8:07 AM.

Ref #11 Talwinder Singh ji: Guru Nanak was not showing any lack of submission to Akal Purakh when he lay down with his feet in a certain direction in Mecca or threw water towards the west in Hardwar. He was challenging the mind-set of people who impose their beliefs on others. Who are we to judge who is healthy or not? Sometimes there may not be a visible disability, but movement might be impaired. We need to have some faith in individual judgement. It is not that people have less faith, instead the focus has shifted from self to minding others. What kind of an example are we setting for our younger generation by insisting the Guru is served only by casting out our infirm and elderly, instead of giving them first priority, and focusing your seva on making them welcome and comfortable. 'Dhaul dharam' is the offspring of compassion, as says Japji Sahib, not the clinical adherence to rules.

21: MKS (New York City, USA), December 05, 2013, 11:29 AM.

I agree with S.Singh #17: We need to provide solutions. Also, we need to remember that it may not be possible to retrofit every gurdwara for wheel-chair access. So here's my proposal for wheel-chair access at the Darbar Sahib and a disclaimer that I have no knowledge of either building design or architecture. (1) A wheel chair access lane be created from the Darshani Deorhi to the Darbar Sahib, this could be a little wider than the standard size of the wheel chair. The lane could be taken from the 'return' lanes at the Darshani Deorhi which is not as crowded. (2) A small ramp that allows the wheel chair to be pushed into the Darbar Sahib and a ramp to bring the wheel chair down to the sarovar level. Again the ramps could be moveable wooden planks to avoid any structural changes to the original structure. (3) It gets tricky if a wheel chair person or someone who can't sit on the floor wants to sit in the Darbar Hall. Create wooden benches not inside the Darbar Hall but outside at the sarovar level. Put signs on the benches in different languages saying this is only for the disabled. Again, I'm being simplistic but solutions do exist and we as the sangat should recognize it may not be possible in all gurdwaras.

22: Surjeet Singh (Long Island, New York, USA), December 05, 2013, 7:15 PM.

This non-issue has been deliberately raised, possibly under the guidance of yheir political masters to create a rift amongst diaspora Sikhs and to distract them from raising the gross human rights abuses in India and the plight of Sikh political prisoners who are rotting in Indian dungeons for decades. We all as a community are responsible for paying scant regard to our brothers and sisters who sacrificed their lives and families and suffered untold miseries for the Sikh nation. Take the latest example (which unfortunately even this web site has also ignored) when a Sikh activist Bhai Gurbakhsh Singh Khalsa went on a hunger strike, demanding the immediate release of innocent Sikh political prisoners who had ALREADY COMPLETED their court mandated sentences and are still languishing in Indian prisons for decades. Giani Gurbachan Singh finally showed up after 20 days to meet Bhai Gurbakhsh Singh. While shedding crocodile tears and paying lip service for the release of the prisoners, his message to Gurbaksh Singh and other Sikh activists was to fold up their protest, since his political boss and Chief Minister of Punjab Parkash Badal had no power to get these Sikhs released. He was again virtually a mute spectator yesterday when police stopped a peaceful march from Amritsar to Gurdwara Amb Sahib and insulted the Sikh sangat at Harmandar Sahib. Just a few hours ago in a violent commando raid by Punjab police and Indian intelligence agencies in plain clothes and in the thick of the night this peaceful hunger strike was broken up and Bhai Gurbakhsh Singh was abducted and whisked away to an unknown place. Sikhs are fearing the worst and have requested that the entire Sikh diaspora take up his issue with human rights organizations, western governments and the United Nations. The Akal Takht is a unique concept established by Guru Hargobind Sahib, which has been hijacked by the Indian Government and its minor minions who rule Punjab. The Jathedar of the Akal Takht is Mukh Sewadar who should guard Sikh values with his "head on his hand". But unfortunately because of our political plight, only corrupt and cowardly midgets have been "appointed" and their recent actions and conduct since 1984 has been shameful. While the Indian Government's first target was the physical destruction of the Akal Takht structure, it has very successfully used these yes men to destroy its core philosophy of Miri-Piri. Giani Gurbachan Singh has lost the confidence of the Sikh nation and must resign from his role immediately. Only a Saint Soldier and an intellectual who is selected by the widest consensus by an assembly of the Sarbat Khalsa of well recognized diaspora organizations should be the Mukh Sewadar of Akal Takht Sahib. We should NEVER accept an appointed servant who came out of the "lifaffa" handed out to the SGPC by Parkash Badal or his son.

23: Talwinder Singh (USA), December 06, 2013, 9:58 AM.

R Singh ji (Ref #20), we should challenge ourselves to progress spiritually, but what I fail to understand is how a chair/bench seating can lead us to impede our spirituality (irrespective of the condition of an individual). The question here should not be chair/seating but ease of accessibility (within the gurdwara premises) for an individual to be on a path to a more spiritual life. Let our concerns be such. We need to be loving and compassionate, the very core of our teachings, but true compassion will only arise from the love for Waheguru. The compassion that we see around us, please forgive me, is tainted with moh/maya. My post earlier (Ref# 11) may have been emotionally inclined and I may have been wrong to judge others on their condition. Bhul chuk maaf karna. I would concur with Surjeet Singh ji (# 22) and H Kaur ji (# 18) that this is a non-issue and that there are other important issues for the Akal Takht to address.

24: Sarvjit Singh (Millis, Massachusetts, USA), December 06, 2013, 10:21 AM.

Perhaps we could only allow wheel-chairs. I observe that some who are old want to sit on benches simply because it is more comfortable. Wheelchairs and benches and chairs, etc. should be exceptions when truly needed, not the norm. Otherwise, nobody will want to sit in pangat anymore. In my opinion, the best resolution is to allow wheelchairs or benches where needed after some kind of verification of the need.

25: Manbir Singh Banwait (Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada), December 11, 2013, 4:21 AM.

I'm amazed at how something so simple has become an issue. If someone is handicapped or needs special access due to age/illness, it should be granted, no questions asked. Simple. Problem solved.

Comment on "Questions Begging for Answers"









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.