Roundtable

One Dr Prabhjot Singh Assailant Arrested:
The Roundtable Open Forum # 118

NEWS REPORT & INTERVIEW

NEWS REPORT:

New York, USA - April 20, 2014

One of the 20-25 men who assaulted a Sikh-American Columbia University professor in upper Manhattan last summer, has been arrested and charged with a hate crime, police said on Saturday, April 19, 2014.

Christian Morales, 20, was charged with aggravated harassment in connection with September's attack on the Dr Prabhjot Singh, who suffered a broken jaw.

Prabhjot Singh, 31, was walking home with a friend in upper Manhattan when he was approached by a group of young men, he said days after his attack.

He was then kicked and punched in an attack that ended after other people intervened, police said.

Detectives from the hate crimes task force are continuing to investigate the case.

*   *   *   *   *

INTERVIEW

The following are excerpts from an interview Dr Prabhjot Singh recently did with Colleen McKown, in which he shares his perspective on being a Sikh-American and the ways in which the perceptions of Sikhs in America are changing.


Q   Tell me about your experience as a Sikh in New York. What reactions have you gotten over the years to your turban and beard?

A    However you present yourself, however you offer yourself up is basically how people accept their perception of you. And for the most part, I think there’s generally almost a taboo of asking what may be personal questions.

What I’ve generally found is that people really remember me because of my beard and turban. And this for the most part has incredibly positive benefits professionally and personally, (but) I think that the key is that when you get beneath the surface, one layer below: Why does this guy wear a turban? Why does he grow a beard? I think there’s really not that much understanding and there might actually be a taboo about asking anything further.

(Sikhs generally have) very positive interactions with other people on a day-to-day basis. But if you go a little bit deeper, I don’t think that there’s that much understanding of who Sikhs are and who they’re not ... their basic belief system or structure and how that manifests itself in day-to-day life.

(For example,) why do you find so many Sikhs working on social justice issues? Is that a coincidence? Is that on purpose? Why do you see them associated with good business ethics or entrepreneurship? How did your cab driver, who’s a Sikh guy, get to be there, and why are there so many of them?

I think that these kind of basic questions may not come up that often because it’s not necessarily that often that people encounter Sikhs, so it’s kind of an interesting phenomenon. At least in New York City, you kind of notice and move on.


Q   And what do you think should be done to change this, for people to have more of an understanding?

A   I think that there are three things.

On one level, it’s something that every Sikh does every day, which is recognize that they may be the only Sikh person that someone may encounter in their life or in this decade or in New York.

And you’re really aware of that, and so at every moment you recognize that you’re an ambassador. And at the very least, you want to convey some sense of your values in just your day-to-day interactions ...

The second is that that actually has to be tied to being a Sikh. There’s a lot of people who encounter a Sikh and they think, “Wow, that’s a really nice person” or “(That) was a nice interaction,” but they may not recognize that there’s so much Sikh tradition and faith that leads to that not being an uncommon occurrence.

And so tying that to education in schools, advocacy and simply increasing awareness through educational means I think is pretty important.

And then the third is a deeper conversation that we have to have in America, which is, it’s actually (OK) to ask questions like “Why do you believe the things you do?” or “What do you believe in? Why do you wear a turban? Do women wear turbans as well? Why do you grow your hair?”

These questions -- I think as a community we invite them, and as a broader society, I think, it’s really important to encourage that type of really direct questioning in a polite or forthright way.

But without that, you never really get beyond the skin deep. And that leaves us in a dangerous position when the skin deep is presented or vilified or shown in media as being associated with a lot of feelings and emotions that may be negative.


Q   In December a man was sentenced to prison for three years for brutally attacking a Sikh cab driver in Seattle, and then, of course, there was the hate crime that happened to you in Harlem, and I know that there have been several such incidents since 9/11. From your perspective, do attacks like this happen a lot?

A   I think one thing is that every single time an attack happens, it’s really felt and known, and word travels very quickly. And so you really feel it in your heart ...

It very well could be somebody you know, and it oftentimes is ...

As a result, it feels like it happens very often. It certainly feels like there has been an uptick since 9/11. But at the same time, for the same reason that people feel it across the community, it’s also galvanized and brought together a pretty scattered immigrant community which has spent 20 to 30 years just trying to get on its feet economically and socially.

I also see an incredibly socially engaged group of teenagers, kids in their 20s, 30s, who are not only addressing Sikh issues but see it as a broader palette of social justice questions -- whether it’s around immigration, safety in communities, bullying, gun violence -- and I really see what feels to me to be a kind of renaissance of awareness that we are part of a country that itself is grappling with a lot of dissonance and really a need for social healing.


Q   And from what you have seen, are perpetrators of attacks prosecuted for their actions?

A   There’s nothing in the Sikh faith that says not to prosecute or not hold people responsible ... but what we’ve seen generally is that whenever a Sikh family is asked to move into (a) prosecutorial decision, there’s really a heavy leaning towards reaching for something deeper ... something more based on healing, learning, restorative justice -- seeing that this isn’t necessarily even just about the perpetrator.

It’s really about a broader set of issues, including education, including outreach.


Q   In your case, did anything happen to the perpetrators?

A   I fully cooperated with the New York Police Department ("NYPD") and the District Attorney’s office, and to my knowledge today, nobody’s been caught in the case. So, you know, to the best of my knowledge, about half a mile from where I live, about 20 to 25 people who were involved in my attack are still out there. And it certainly imbues a keen sense that we are a deeply connected community -- not always for the best, but most certainly, we’re all in it together.


Q   A Sikh-American man, Waris Singh Ahluwalia, was featured in a Gap ad that was displayed in the New York City subway system (and all over North America) last November. In a few isolated incidents, people wrote racial slurs on the posters, like “make bombs” and “stop driving taxis.”

Gap responded by making the ad their cover photo on Twitter and tweeting their support for Waris Singh Ahluwalia. Was it surprising to you that people wrote racial slurs on the ads?

A   No, not at all. I mean, it’s no more surprising to me that there would be racial slurs on the ad as much as somebody would yell something at me as I walk to the hospital or to my work at Columbia University. You know, it happens on a regular enough basis that it certainly doesn’t surprise anyone.


Q   Do you think most companies would have responded the way Gap did in terms of defending Waris and making the ad their cover photo on Twitter to show their support?

A   I don’t think so, not necessarily. I mean, I think that companies and marketing departments are pretty smart. They know their demographic. They know who they appeal to. Gap, I’m sure, has done some deep market research to understand that this is actually something positive for them, and I think they were rewarded for it. (We’ve seen that around the) same time A&E also defended Phil Robertson in “Duck Dynasty” because (the network) also recognized that its constituency would reward it for defending it strongly.


Q   Do you think there’s been an increase in seeing Sikh faces in advertisements and pop culture in the past few years?

A   There definitely has been an increase in just the images of Sikhs around. I have a one-and-a-half-year-old son ... I couldn’t imagine when I was young to go to a Gap and see a picture of a Sikh man or a Sikh woman in the mall. And so in many ways, it’s a clearly different world just on that basis alone.

And I think we end up seeing more often stories about people that are not necessarily explicitly recognized for being Sikh -- for example, a successful entrepreneur, somebody who’s running for a council seat in New Jersey, a Sikh woman who’s the head of California’s GOP organizing committee -- so you end up recognizing and seeing that Sikhs are a part of the fabric of American life.


Q   In 2012, before you were attacked yourself, you co-wrote an op-ed for The New York Times about the need for the FBI to specifically track hate crimes against Sikhs. Just last year, the FBI decided to start tracking hate crimes against Sikhs. How did you get interested in writing about this issue initially?

A   I think the issue itself is really on the community’s mind.

I don’t mean to think of the Sikh community as having one kind of mind. We have a lot of incredibly different perspectives, but 700-plus attacks, hate crimes (against) Sikhs after 9/11 have really led the community to want to understand best how to resolve this problem ...

A New York Times op-ed (like mine) is an important visual indicator that something should change, but there is an incredible grass-roots and well-organized movement from such a large range of groups (like the Sikh Coalition and the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund) to see this change happen that when the FBI actually considered doing so, I think they really saw that it had broad support.

Congressional hearings later that fall and in the spring underscored just the degree of support that was coming from congressmen, from public advocates, from citizens -- some were Sikh, and many were not.


Q   What are some ways in which you think the FBI tracking hate crimes will directly benefit the Sikh community, and does this directly give Sikh-Americans greater protections against hate crimes?

A   Surveillance itself is protective, I experienced that firsthand ... Likely it will happen that other Sikhs will be attacked in hate crimes over the next years. But what we can do is really start to understand where, how and why hate crimes occur against Sikhs or other groups.

And that forms the basis of being able to make specific suggestions, becoming proactive instead of defensive and preventative instead of dealing with an aftermath of these events.


Q   Having experienced a violent hate crime yourself, how will this experience impact any further work you do on behalf of the Sikh community to increase awareness or anything else?

A   I think in two ways.

One, in my own professional work, where I work on community health and health systems in America, I think something that struck me deeply is that violence and safety are as much a part of a community’s sense of its own health as diabetes and heart disease. And I think that really hit home for me just last fall, and as a result, I really had to look more deeply at how I’m going about my work so I could start to understand how to integrate that very personal insight into it.

In terms of advocacy for Sikhs, I think certainly the story of what happened to me has traveled quite a bit, and I think it’s important to understand how to be an advocate for the Sikh community and at the same (time) make sure that what we learn and how we share it benefits others.

So it certainly deepens my commitment and resolve to being a community advocate. But I think that the biggest takeaway is that community advocacy is both at the local level and for Sikhs across the country.


Q   Do you think Sikhs who wear the beard and turban end up being spokespeople or even activists for the Sikh community whether or not they choose to?

A   Absolutely, and I think that that’s core to the tradition. The very founding of the Sikh tradition was based upon a social activism against inequality for women, breaking against the Hindu caste system in India, breaking against the Mughal Empire rule and forced conversion to Islam at the time.

The very nature of the Sikh identity has always been in the spirit of social activism. You see us so visibly in a turban and a beard for the very basic reason that whenever we’re in a public setting, you always know who a Sikh is and what they stand for and what you should be able to expect, for being able to get help and standing up for people who need it ...

I think there’s in no way a question that the benefits of visibly standing up for your faith and conveying it to others and allowing the community around you to see it too is absolutely worth whatever downsides may come in the process.


THE ROUNDTABLE OPEN FORUM # 118

We invite comments, opinions and reactions to the news item at the beginning of this piece, as well as on the thoughts expressed by Dr Prabhjot Singh in the interview.



[Dr. Prabhjot Singh’s interview has been condensed and edited by Leslie Hart.]


[Courtesy: Al Jazeera. Edited for sikhchic.com]
April 21, 2014

 

read other articles in Roundtable