Kids Corner

Current Events

Sikh-Americans Need Their Own Al Sharpton

DEAN OBEIDALLAH

 

 

 



In the wake of the hate-driven near-death of a Sikh man in Queens (New York City, USA), officialdom’s response has been apathetic.

Sikhs must demand more.

Love or hate Rev. Al Sharpton, there’s one thing you can’t deny: He’s effective.

You don’t have look any further for proof than his recent efforts raising awareness about the death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man who died shortly after New York Police Department (“NYPD”) officers placed him in an illegal choke hold.

Sharpton organized rallies, held press conferences that made headlines, met with the mayor of New York City and federal officials.

Bottom line: His actions increase the chances that justice will be served.

And one community that needs its own Sharpton is the Sikhs. To be honest, I think every minority group needs someone like Reverend Al to stir things up, including my own Arab and Muslim-American communities.

And yes, I’m aware of Sharpton’s historical baggage that critics love to tout. In my eyes, he transcended that years ago, but even those for whom that isn’t true surely recognize that families like Garner’s come to depend on him and authority figures can’t ignore him.

Sikhs have been the subject of numerous hate crimes in recent years across the United States, including a vicious incident last week in New York City.

But attacks against Sikhs attract little media attention. And as New York City Sikh leaders noted, these incidents merit even less of a response from the NYPD. In fact, Sikhs are even discriminated against when applying to join the NYPD because of their turbans and beards.

Prior to 9/11, wearing a beard a turban may have been at times challenging. However, after that terrorist attack, that look has proved at times to be dangerous, even deadly. Within days of 9/11, a Sikh man in Mesa, Arizona, was shot and killed by an individual who -- mistaking him for a Muslim -- proudly declared to the police upon his arrest: “I’m a patriot and an American.”

Since then, more than 700 attacks have been recorded on Sikhs in the United States. In fact, this week marked the two-year anniversary of a white supremacist gunning down six Sikh-Americans while they were worshipping in their gurdwara in Wisconsin.

A great deal of these hate crimes are marked by the assailants calling the Sikhs “Osama Bin Laden” or “terrorists.” And many of my Sikh friends have shared with me a history of racial slurs and menacing stares they have endured over the years.

Even in New York City, a place that touts itself as a progressive bastion, Sikhs have suffered a string of hate crimes. In 2003, members of a Sikh family were beaten outside their Queens home by people yelling: “Go back to your country, Bin Laden.”

In 2004, two Sikh men were viciously beaten by young white assailants while walking on the sidewalk. Sikh teens have been bullied and harassed in New York City high schools, with some even having their turbans or facial hair forcibly removed.  And in 2009, two Sikh men were attacked on the NYC subway after being accused of being related to Bin Laden.

And that brings us to July 30, 2014.  On that night, Sandeep Singh, a local business owner and father of two, was crossing a street in Queens with two friends. As Sandeep walked in front of a white pickup truck that had stopped for the traffic light, the driver yelled: “Go back to your own country, Bin Laden!”

Sandeep responded by standing his ground and telling his friends to call the police.  The driver responded by hitting Sandeep with his truck and dragging him for 30 feet. When you hit someone with your vehicle by accident, you stop. When you don’t stop, it quite probably means you are trying to kill or at least really hurt someone.

Sandeep is alive, thankfully, but he is currently hospitalized with extensive internal injures. According to the local Sikh leaders, however, the NYPD’s response has been slow and bordering on truly “apathetic.”

The Sikh community, taking a page from Reverend Al, held a press conference on Tuesday to call attention to this hate crime and the NYPD’s lack of action. But as a reporter for The Gothamist noted, even after this press conference, the NYPD is doing little in the way of investigating this incident. Indeed, the NYPD has still not labeled this attack a hate crime.

And making matters worse is that Sikhs are, in general, banned from serving in the NYPD. There have been certain exceptions, but the policy is tilted heavily to excluding Sikhs because of their beards and turbans.

As Rajdeep Singh of the Sikh Coalition, a national Sikh civil rights group, explained to me, Sikhs have a long history of serving their communities in uniform and want to do the same in the NYPD.

In fact, in 2004, two Sikh men successfully sued the NYPD and were reinstated as traffic enforcement officers after being discharged because they wouldn’t remove their turbans while working. And while Sikhs are serving in the police forces in Washington, D.C., and in cities in Canada and the UK, the NYPD has made it all but impossible for a Sikh to become one of New York’s finest.

As Rajdeep Singh noted, excluding Sikhs from the NYPD is counterproductive to the very idea of community-based policing. Instead of building relations with the New York City Sikh community, perhaps upwards of 50,000 people, it’s causing more of an adversarial relationship with the NYPD.

What’s especially heartbreaking is that in many instances, Sikhs are being targeted because people believe they are Muslim. Being Muslim myself, I feel an added sense of anguish, almost guilt over the fact that the Sikhs are suffering because people think they are of my faith. 

Although, as Rajdeep Singh noted, bigots hate anything that’s different from them.

The Sikh community deserves better from the NYPD.  Maybe it means the Sikhs need to channel their inner Al Sharpton even more. The lessons of having a Sharpton-type figure should be clear for every minority group: If you don’t make noise and raise awareness, you will be unlikely to see justice.

UPDATE: I was informed by the Sikh Coalition that another apparent hate crime against Sikhs occurred in New York City on Thursday night -- less than two weeks after Sandeep Singh was run down by a vehicle in Queens.

In this incident, a Sikh man was walking with his mother on their way to dinner on Roosevelt Island. A group of teens surrounded the two, called the man “Bin Laden” and told them both to go back to their country. The teens also taunted the mother, who was wearing a turban, calling her a “Bitch with facial hair.” The teens then repeatedly punched the Sikh man, threw a bottle at him and ran off.

The Sikh man, a NYC based scientist, required treatment at the hospital and his mother was emotionally distraught after the incident.

Let’s be honest, if a group of white teens beat up an African-American man and taunted his mother because of their race, it would make headlines, the Mayor would hold a press conference and the NYPD would promise swift action.

What will be the response here?


[Courtesy: The Daily Beast. Edited for sikhchic.com]
August 10, 2014
 

Conversation about this article

1: Nira Kaur (New York, USA), August 10, 2014, 5:38 AM.

I couldn't agree with the author more! We need an Al Sharpton of our own in every major Sikh center in the world. But wait ... I thought we did have one here in New York ... The Sikh Coalition. And then, there's SALDEF. What happened to them? The cat got their tongue? I suspect the good men and women who now run these institutions think it is a nine-to-five job, and evenings and weekends are off too! That's the difference between Al Sharpton and our defenders: Sharpton doesn't think its a 'job'; it's a vocation.

2: Inderpreet Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom), August 10, 2014, 5:42 AM.

We've done well in placing professionals who look like Sikhs in these crucial positions. Now, all we need to do is infuse some Sikhi into them ... and get them off their butts!

3: Uddam Singh (London, United Kingdom), August 10, 2014, 5:52 AM.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Sadly, our squeakers -- The Sikh Coalition and SALDEF, the two examples cited above -- don't like to squeak too loudly. They're great at boring photo ops and aimless press releases and meaningless email blasts, but looks like there's no zip in them. Somebody needs to light a fire under them.

4: RP Singh (Frankfurt, Germany), August 10, 2014, 6:06 AM.

This is on point. Where were our national Sikh-American organizations when Parminder Singh Shergill was brutally shot and killed by police in California? Perhaps somehow we've forgotten our Guru's hukam to speak truth to power.

5: Jeet Singh (Brampton, Ontario, Canada), August 10, 2014, 8:03 AM.

Here in Canada, not too long ago, we had our own Al Sharpton. His name was T. Sher Singh. He thundered and was heard far and way beyond our borders, all the way to India and around the world. Today, there's not a soul that has the commitment to step into his shoes. Not the self-serving Sabi Marwah who took over The Centennial Foundation that Sher had started, not the self-important Kulvir Gill ... there's not a squeak from anyone in our media today now that Sher has withdrawn from public life. Everybody wants the glory, no one wants to come forward, with "head on the palm of the hand" ...

6: Parmjit Singh (Canada), August 10, 2014, 8:20 AM.

I don't know the current Sikh Coalition or SALDEF people personally but I am appreciative of their approach and efforts even if there is room for improvement. When it comes to an Al Sharpton and beyondd, speaking her/his mind and able to relate at every level, I cannot think of anyone better than Berkley educated Dr. Jaideep Singh. He is one of the the original founders of SMART (now SALDEF). His academic and personal understanding of race relations and power is second to none. Like many who should be at the forefront, speaking his mind has likely kept him plowing for Sikhs largely behind the scenes. He is a scholar, yet radical thinker whose living and understanding at a grassroots levels runs deep. Hearing him speak his mind on power structures and change reminds one of famous revolutionaries. My criticism is that he is reserved when it comes to the politics of self promotion. If we are in need of a respected cannon, we have a gem. How do we get this machine to the battlefield?

7: Saranjeet Kaur  (New Jersey, USA), August 10, 2014, 9:29 AM.

I have been, and continue to be, a strong supporter of our advocacy institutions, all of them. They've done good work. However, I agree that lately they have failed to step up to the plate at critical times. Are they getting too smug in their bureaucratic roles and forgetting that first and foremost, they need to be activists? And you can't be in activist mode if you're doing things by the book. Yes, please study Al Sharpton ... complete, with his warts and his strengths, and then replicate him in his latter manifestation. No, better, please outdo him! It'll be the greatest honour you can bestow to brave men like him ... and the greatest service you can do for your own community today.

8: Gurpal Singh Bhuller (Chester, Virginia, USA), August 10, 2014, 9:50 AM.

It is easy to be critical of the Sikh Coalition and SALDEF and other organizations doing panthic work. It is also easy to be critical of those individuals who do that. But where is the support for these organizations? They struggle for funds and a lot of what they can do is constrained by funding limits and regulations. Those who want Sikhs to be more forceful advocates of their position need to step up and commit the money and time for their activities. I am not talking of 10 or 20 dollars - I am talking of tens of thousands or millions that are needed for well funded campaigns. These do not happen de novo - it takes commitment, ability and resources (i.e., funds). We have the first two but we are grossly lacking in the third piece.

9: GC Singh (USA), August 10, 2014, 10:11 AM.

I appreciate the work of the Sikh Coalition and the noble intentions of its selfless founders who organized it within days of 9/11. But now they need to innovate and broaden their focus. It looks like most of our civil rights organizations today are too busy sending fund raising emails, holding gala dinners and posing for photos ops at various functions and meetings. They need to do more to change the ground realities in this country by coming up with leaders who can fill the big shoes and become recognized across the length and breadth of the community at large. By arguing that they are a US civil rights organizations, most of them have been timidly avoiding to take a stand, for example, on the continuous genocidal policies in India where a ruthless campaign of assimilation is taking place. Modi's right hand man and RSS chief openly calls Sikhs as Hindus and fascist Hindu gangs are spreading their tentacles far and wide in all Punjab villages. These organizations should give a clarion call for the freeing of Sikh institutions from the gang of political masands who have brought much disgrace. Let them all start with one, simple, focused project by calling for a change of leadership of the Akal Takht and insisting that a Sarbat Khalsa comprising of a broad based gathering with recognized, well-established international Sikh institutions be tasked to choose a new leader. In fact we should insist that a a diaspora Sikh who is articulate, highly educated, a saint soldier and wedded to Sikh values be the next Jathedar. This one change, if done right, will affect the Sikhs throughout the world, provide sorely needed leadership and direction, and enhance unity in the panth.

10: Sarabjit Singh (USA), August 10, 2014, 10:45 PM.

No doubt we need to have more visible and strong Sikh civil rights leaders and more co-ordination between different organizations. However, I admire the work they are doing on shoe string budgets. I know of one young man in the Sikh Coalition who gave up admission in medical school to work there. I know of others in Saldef who gave up lucrative jobs in the private sector to do seva for us. What is sad here is that a young man gets nearly killed by a racist in New York and New York Times does not even cover that. I think everyone reading this column should bombard the editor of NYT and bring shame on the newspaper. In the long run, however, these organizations (Sikh Coalition and Saldef) need to send interns to all the media outlets on a regular basis and see how the wind changes.

11: Manbir Banwait (Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada), August 10, 2014, 10:54 PM.

Nothing happens without funding. All these Sikh organizations lack funding. Our gurdwaras should be great source for funds but yet many are caught up in internal infighting over the golak. The Sikh community indeed needs well-funded Al Sharptons.

12: Rup Singh (Canada), August 10, 2014, 11:15 PM.

I feel that we generally tend to speak of fixing problems from top down. We have very high expectations (rightly so) of our jathedaars and other leaders who like to speak at a national and international level. My two cents is that we should solve issues starting at the grass roots level. Starting in our homes, and begin questioning our gurdwara leaders more. The committees of gurdwaras in large cities have the funds and connections with the elected officials, and they should be at the forefront in dealing with local issues. They are voted in by the sangat and these so-called leaders squander millions collectively on elections and in courts but do very little for Sikhi and Sikhs. The sangat fills the golak and they squander it and when issues like these come up, the gurdwara committees are silent. The sangat then looks to others, most times in far away places, for action.

13: Tegh Kaur (Coventry, United Kingdom), August 11, 2014, 5:04 AM.

Re Gurpal Singh Bhuller (#8) - Of course you are right. These institutions need more funding. But such funding historically comes from a community's most affluent sector: successful professionals and business men and women. In this, those in our community who have been most privileged in success and its rewards have let the community down grievously. Wealth, past a certain point of pure surfeit, becomes meaningless in the hands of its owner. Then, if not invested back into the community on whose shoulders he/she stands on, then both the wealth and the glutton are wasted. I know the people who claim to be the mentors and overseers of these institutions. Amongst them there are some who single-handedly could easily afford to finance the new needs of these institutions ... with merely the wealth they no longer NEED. It is they who have let us down ... not our gurdwaras. It was never the mandate of our gurdwaras to run our institutions. By giving such power to our gurdwaras, all we do is create masands. Which is exactly what we have done today in Punjab. So, back to our ultra-rich professionals and entrepreneurs: you have let us down with your selfishness and shortsightedness. You needn't look elsewhere or point at others.

14: Himmat Singh (New Delhi, India), August 11, 2014, 5:27 AM.

A child prodigy outgrows its glory once he or she grows up but ceases to develop further. That is exactly the situation with the Sikh Coalition, Saldef, United Sikhs, SikhRI, Ensaaf, etc. They did great work in their early years, and then got all caught up in fund-raising and forgot to grow. It is indeed a great achievement that they have stabilized their existence and now employ full-time staff, researchers, etc. But the world and the community is fast outpacing them in growth. If they don't match the pace with the needs of their constituencies, then they turn into failures. It is not a failure of funding that is to blame. It is the failure of leadership. Who are the advisers of these bodies? Who sits on their Boards? What have they done to help these institutions grow?

15: Gurbani Kaur (New York City, USA), August 11, 2014, 7:19 AM.

No doubt much more money is sorely needed to adequately fund these institutions. But that's not the real problem. As pointed out so poignantly in this article, where are our Al Sharptons? So far all we have come up with -- no doubt a step forward -- is a small group of bureaucrats who nibble away at other mainstream bureaucrats to win over a concession here, a compromise there. But where's the courage, the daring to take on the bigger issues, the fierceness that is needed to tackle and topple the bulwarks of ignorance and bigotry? It is true, we no longer need lions on the battlefield any more, but where are the lions (Al Sharptons) confronting the cowards that hide in the corridors of power? All I see are timid souls with neither zip nor energy nor courage! Step out on the street, fellas! Take some risks! Pick a fight ... and win!

16: Gurjender Singh (Maryland, USA), August 11, 2014, 12:07 PM.

Sikhs and all the gurdwaras across the USA should support (by regular funds) the Sikh Coalision and SALDEF so that they can do a better job to reprsent us in the media and with the authorities. Just spending money and effort in nagar kirtans will not help, because they fail to educate the non-Punjabi speaking Americans. All the Sikh organizations must have a common, united body and a common leadership to lead them.

17: Hardarshan Singh Valia (Highland, California, USA), August 11, 2014, 9:10 PM.

The Sikh Coalition is busy working on the legal side of discrimination and hate crimes. These youths are highly focused towards their mission. I suggest that a well known personality such as Waris Singh Ahulwalia could organize a rally in Central Park of New York with assistance from Spike Lee and Wes Anderson that will attract many from the mainstream America (and media) and spread awareness about Sikhs. The rally could end with singing by Jay Sean. Thereafter, such rallies could be emulated at other major cities. Hopefully then someone like Al Sharpton will emerge.

18: Gurpal Singh Bhuller (Chester, Virginia, USA), August 11, 2014, 10:55 PM.

Re: Tegh Kaur (#13 above). Thank you for raising a very valid point about those Sikhs with lots of wealth and not sharing it for the benefit of the panth. Your heart is in the right place but what you consider wealth may be just the cash flow needed to run a large corporation. I agree with you that there are individuals who have enough resources to take care of the funding requirements of some of these organizations - but for how long? This cannot be the work of individuals. It is too important to be left to them. Such work can only be done by an interested and committed few. If there is funding only by one person, there is great danger in the future direction of the organization concerned. Their fund raising skills atrophy and conversely, others step aside since that organization is now being "taken care of". It becomes almost impossible for the organization to do activities that their patron disapproves, even though those activities may be part of their mandate. It is only the community that can do that. This does not mean that the rich guys should step back. They too need to do their share, and maybe more, if they really have feelings for the welfare of the community.

19: Tegh Kaur (Coventry, United Kingdom), August 12, 2014, 2:07 AM.

Gurpal ji (#18): I'm sorry but you don't make any sense whatsoever. In answer to your nitpicking, so get two or three or four of these ultra-rich people to fund each institution, if one is not good. Or as many as you need. I didn't suggest that it should only be one, if you need more! You seem to be quite oblivious of the fact that institutions around the world -- in your US, here in the UK, out there even in India -- have always been built with the support of wealthy benefactors in each of the respective communities. The Rakab Ganj Gurdwara in New Delhi, for example, was virtually rebuilt by a single man only a few decades ago. And I don't buy your lame definition of wealth. Each one of the people I am alluding to who can but doesn't do his/her civic duty, for example, lives in extravagant residences (to take but one example); if the gluttony alone was pared down, an entire institution could be funded with the 'spare change'. So, those funds won't pay for a life-time of running expenses. No problem, use it as seed money. I'll go further: some of these very people waste more money each day, every day of their lives, than what's needed to hire and sustain a full-fledged professional in these institutions. I'm sorry, but your apologia absolutely, completely astounds me. I sincerely hope that such or similar thinking as yours doesn't invade those who run these institutions or 'support' them. Or, does it?

Comment on "Sikh-Americans Need Their Own Al Sharpton"









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.