Kids Corner

Current Events

Who's Afraid of Sarabhjit Singh Dhunda?

IQBAL SINGH

 

 

 

Sayeth Nanak: Falsehood fails. Only His Truth is left standing …”
[Guru Amar Das, GGS:1283.17]


The week of November 4 to 11, 2012  will be remembered by those in the Sikh-Briton community who were witness to the following events as both a sad chapter in our affairs and, at the same time, a triumph of Truth over Falsehood.

During the week, a visiting Sikh scholar - Professor Sarabhjit Singh Dhunda - was twice stopped from addressing the sangat. And then, the night of November 11 saw violence erupt in and disrupt proceedings at a UK gurdwara.

So who is this Sarabhjit Singh that some would resort to violence to prevent him from speaking and yet others will pack a gurdwara hall to capacity to hear what he has to say?

What is it that he has said that engenders such controversy?

Sarabhjit Singh is a graduate from the Gurmat Gyan Missionary College, Ludhiana. The institution is world renowned for its dedication to spreading the message of Guru Granth Sahib, with the emphasis that it is the only source of spiritual guidance for a Sikh. 

It is the simplicity of his message, that nothing but Guru Shabad should be relied upon for guidance and that time should be taken to contemplate Shabad, that attracts sangats in large numbers to his talks.

But, at the same time, there are a couple of reasons why his utterances are at the centre of controversy.

The first is that he is outspoken in his opposition to the ‘sant samaj' and  ‘dehravaad,’ i.e., the cult of personality based on so called ‘holy men’ which, ever prevalent in India, has now spread into Punjab and is now also infecting the diaspora. 

Secondly, along with others such as Prof Darshan Singh, Sarabhjit Singh is of the view that the entirety of the Dasam Granth is not the composition of Guru Gobind Singh.

It is this latter position which is most irksome to his opponents.

These opponents were determined to stop him from airing his views during his visit to the UK, which began on November 3, 2012.

The detractors got their first opportunity to do so at the Sri Guru Singh Sabha Gurdwara in Slough on Sunday, November 4. He was scheduled to address the sangat at 11 that morning and  arrived at the gurdwara on schedule. But his opponents had also gathered there. They were determined that Sarabhjit Singh  be stopped, no matter what the cost and regardless of the disruption it may cause in the gurdwara service.

And so it was that when Sarabhjit Singh took the stage, before he had uttered a single word, those who had come to disrupt his talk, stood up and caused mayhem in the darbar and forced him off the stage.

Some of the miscreants who had come to prevent him from expressing his views were identified as having come from as far away as the Midlands, some 125 miles away.

During the ensuing scuffles, some of them were even heard to shout, ‘Knock off his turban!’ He suffered minor bruising during the melee.

Thus, Sarabhjit Singh was not allowed to speak from the stage, despite the majority of the Slough sangat wanting him to do so. He had been stopped from doing so by a small but loud and violent handful, many of whom had been imported to the congregation for the purpose.

This event on its own raises some profound questions but the events in Slough were just a minor precursor to the even more disturbing events that would take place during the rest of the week, culminating in the sad goings-on the night of the following Sunday, November 11, 2012.

Another flashpoint took place on the evening of Saturday, November 10, when, in an act of desperation to stop him speaking, his opponents invoked the involvement of the Jathedar of the Akal Takht into the whole affair.

After having inundated the offices of the Jathedar in Amritsar, Punjab, with calls threatening that a continuation of Sarabhjit Singh’s katha would result in ‘trouble‘, they somehow managed to persuade the Jathedar to issue a directive that the event be cancelled for the evening.

So, to the dismay of the sangat, but to the delight of his opponents, the lecture was cancelled. The service was brought to a close and the sangat started to leave.

However, the mood of the sangat was one of simmering resentment at the handful of protestors, some of whom were told to their faces that evening that on this occasion they had even outdone the Taliban.

The next day, Sunday, November 11, clarification was sought from the Jathedar in Amritsar by the committee members of the Gurdwaras of Southall. Ironically, they were told that the restriction on Sarabhjit Singh had only been for the previous evening in order to maintain peace in the community. Something which had been threatened by his opponents in the first place!

The Jathedar made it clear that there was no further restriction.

Sarabhjit Singh spoke to a fully packed hall at the Guru Nanak Darbar, Southall, later that afternoon, where he was honoured with a siropa. It was at the end of this darbar that members of the Sri Guru Singh Sabha Gurdwara committee announced that he was invited to return to Sri Guru Singh Sabha and speak there that evening.

That evening, the sangat arriving at the said gurdwara could sense that something was brewing as there was a strong police presence outside, even before the katha started. The hall inside was packed full, once again, when at around 7:30 Sarabhjit Singh commenced his talk.

He spoke for an hour and during that hour the ranks of those who were determined to do violence to him swelled. The same ‘president’ of a Midlands gurdwara who had been present at the Slough ruckus was there again.

What followed the end of the lecture was 3 hours of what can only be described as some of the most shameful and ugly behaviour I have ever witnessed from individuals who would call themselves Sikhs.

It was behaviour similar to what we witnessed a couple of years earlier from the same mob when Prof Darshan Singh had been invited to do kirtan at the Miri Piri Gurdwara, again in Southall. On that occasion too, individuals who otherwise wore kirpans and professed to be amritdhari Sikhs, broke windows at the gurdwara and shouted such obscenities that they can’t be repeated here.

That scene was repeated on the night of November 11. The gurdwara gate was damaged. The hooligans assaulted members of the sangat as well as a female police officer. They shouted obscenities at Sarabhjit Singh and were determined not to let him leave the gurdwara without doing violence to him.

They effectively laid siege to the gurdwara for more than 3 hours and trapped whole families inside with little children who had to listen to their obscenities.

Finally, the police who controlled the situation admirably had to resort to using police dogs to disperse the mob and had to escort Prof Sarabhjit singh out with a police van. But even after he had left, it was sometime before police could let the rest of the sangat out safely.

I have described to you in detail what happened in order to lay the groundwork for a discussion on some basic questions the events raise for our community worldwide, not the least of which is, who should be responsible for running our gurdwaras?

Should it be the committees appointed by the local sangat or a group of extremists bent on violence who can arrange flying hit-squads in a matter of hours?

Sikhi is the fount of human rights and freedoms to a degree never seen before in human history. It accords basic freedoms to all.

Are we now to tolerate an assault on freedom of speech?

More tomorrow ...
 

Conversation about this article

1: Kulwant Singh  (Oakville, Ontario, Canada), November 20, 2012, 6:00 AM.

I would like to thank, from the bottom of my heart, the great people of the UK who have done a great service to Sikhi, and to Sarabhjit Singh ji. I am not talking about those who wanted Sarabjit Singh to speak, but of the ones who did everything they could to stop him. You see, I was not tuned into this before as much as I probably should have been. However, these "good" people have provided such great publicity and have now got my full attention to read and learn all about Sarabhjit Singh and his message. These neanderathals, so-called Sikhs (read Taliban), have likely never heard of the internet. They thought that having the speech at the gurudwara cancelled will stop the message from reaching the sangat. But for them, Sarabhjit Singh would never have reached the number of people that are now going to know all about him and his message. Thank you, Iqbal Singh ji, for writing this article and to sikhchic.com for posting it. Sat Sri Akal.

2: Simran Singh (United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 6:02 AM.

These developments are truly disturbing. How is it that these fanatic elements do not disrupt practice in those deras where practices fall short of the rehat maryada? Where are they while the Nirankiari and Radhasoami deras proliferate? They are a disgrace to the community and we should stand up to them. How can we protect the human rights of others if we can't defend our own right to freedom of expression? These "Federation" and Taksal-wallahs have for over 20 years exploited the sense of injustice which the Sikhs have genuinely felt. They have bullied or eliminated dissent and grown so audacious that now they challenge our God-given and state-protected right to listen to the scholars of our choice.

3: Shaminder Singh (United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 9:01 AM.

Just read bani on your own and try and think what it means to you.

4: Baldev Singh (Bradford, United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 9:18 AM.

Division on sectarian and political lines (Sikhi doesn't even figure anywhere to these bozos anymore) have made so many a rag-tag group of castes, groups, factions, baabey, egomaniacs ...

5: Jagbeer Singh Khalsa (Birmingham, United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 9:26 AM.

Thank you very much to the author and to sikhchic.com for bringing this to our attention.

6: Joga Singh (London, United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 9:26 AM.

I witnessed the scenes at Southall and was appalled at the behaviour of the miscreants. If these people don't like Prof Sarbhjit Singh's ideas, then they simply don't have to attend. No one is coerced to go to a gurdwara. Why disrupt by violence and hooliganism, especially in the presence of the very Guru you claim to revere? I am not engaged in community politics in the UK but it is clear that the mob was comprised of an amalgam of Taksalis and ISYF supporters. They obviously have nothing better to do. They seem to have adopted the mentality of Brahiminsm. Their fascist intolerance is a dark stain on those they represent. Sikhism is a religion of tolerance and peace. Prof Sarbhjit Singh challenges illogical and false practices. He brings us closer to the Guru. Had these bigots been around at the time of Guru Nanak they would no doubt have stoned him for having Hindu parents, a Muslim companion, and the courage to visit Hardwar and Mecca. I commend Iqbal Singh for bringing this incident to the widest possible audience. It deserves more than just an exchange in the pages of the weekly Punjabi papers.

7: Narinder Singh (Chicago, Illinois, USA), November 20, 2012, 9:44 AM.

Complain and protest against censorship in India, but promote it in our gurdwara? These chaps have certainly lost their way.

8: R Singh (Surrey, British Columbia, Canada), November 20, 2012, 10:35 AM.

For approximately 237 years, the Gurus gave us teachings through practice and bani. There are some out there who haven't learnt anything.

9: Harman Singh (California, USA), November 20, 2012, 10:51 AM.

If we let Sikhi be held hostage by a small group of miscreants, our future does not bode well. If a limb becomes necrotic, it needs to be severed from the rest of the body, no matter how painful it is. We need to stand up to injustices within our community; only then can we be called upon to fight against injustice against others. I stand in solidarity with Prof. Sarabhjit Singh.

10: Amandeep Singh Sandhu (Delhi, India), November 20, 2012, 10:56 AM.

Thank you, S. Iqbal Singh, for describing the events and kudos to sikhchic.com for carrying the testimonial. I am not aware of the work of S. Sarabjit Singh and will certainly learn more about his views in the weeks to come. I feel a speaker should be given his space to speak and if someone does not agree they can register a protest and the matter can be debated. To me, Sikhism, with its emphasis on learning, is the most egalitarian religion. It is indeed sad to note that such tactics are being adopted by a few to silence voices. I condemn the high-handedness by the group which opposed the speaker.

11: J Singh (West London, United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 2:12 PM.

There is a seminal composition of Guru Nanak's in Raag Ramkali called 'Siddh Gosht'. It epitomises what Sikhi is all about. It is a debate between Guru Nanak and the reclusive 'holy' men of his time called the Siddhs who had chosen to leave society and retire to the mountains in search of God. Even though Guru Sahib disagreed with their philosophy completely, he sought them out and engaged them in discourse and debate. That is what Sikhi is all about, imparting and acquiring knowledge. Hell, it's in our name: 'Sikh'. One wonders what the opponents of Sarbjit Singh would have done to the Siddhs. Gone to meet them with sticks and cudgels? They should be ashamed of calling themselves Sikhs. They might take a lesson from George Orwell who said: "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."

12: Charanjit ( Southhall, United Kingdom ), November 20, 2012, 3:01 PM.

It was a similar kind of incident with Professor Darshan Singh a few years ago that took place in Southhall, and prompted me to research the Dasam Granth. After what I have read, I totally agree with both of them, that my Guru could never write such lewd stuff. I would like to ask Sarabjit Singh to carry on with his great parchar; it is long overdue and very refreshing to listen to such gurbani vichaar. I would also like to ask these hooligans to clear up the rubbish that is at their own doorstep instead of interfering in the affairs of gurdwaras 125 miles away. Where were they when a baba accused of rape opened a gurdwara near them, why didn't they contact the Jathedar and stop him setting up his gurdwara? These thugs don't care about Sikhi, their only interest is taking over the gurdwaras by force and making the sangat do what they want. I would just like to say to these racals that today's sangat is more knowledgeable then them and their so called parcharaks, so please leave it to the sangat to decide what they wish to listen to, don't force your choice on people. We were at the gurdwara that day and their behaviour was indeed disgraceful.

13: Baldev Singh (Bradford, United Kingdom), November 20, 2012, 4:04 PM.

The problem stems from the hinduization of the ignorant and gullible segments in the community. We need to tackle that problem in order to address the others.

14: Gurpreet Singh (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), November 20, 2012, 5:12 PM.

The average Sikh doesn't follow the Dasam Granth ... or am i mistaken? Sikhs only bow to the Guru Granth Sahib. Why are we creating a fuss about something that doesn't have a strong hold among Sikhs? Our scholars and preachers should focus on the Guru's Word and stay away from unwanted, unnecessary controversy about a granth which is not followed by the majority. I don't understand why either side wants to delve in this useless issue.

15: Sangat Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), November 20, 2012, 5:31 PM.

Many years ago, in the late 50's, there was a raging controversy whether 'Raag Mala' should be read or not. So, in one of the oldest gurdwaras in Singapore, a few 'talibans' had parked themselves on a 'manji' cot suitably equipped with lathis, and kept asking the sangat if the 'akhand path' had reached that point which should not be read. Someone asked them which part were they referring to. "Oh! The Deepmala!" They didn't even know that it was 'Raagmala' they were purporting to take offense with, and yet were ready to raise a hullabaloo over it. It's the same here with these chaps taking issue with Sarabhjit Singh ji and Darshan Singh ji.

16: Jasdeep Singh (Malaysia), November 20, 2012, 9:47 PM.

It is sad that some tend to get violent when they hear something they disagree with, which also happens to be the easiest way out of an issue. They need to be more mature and find proper venues to discuss and address issues or clarifications. We pray for his GurParsad to guide us and hopefully this does not repeat. It is a shame to see any Sikh behaving this badly.

17: Jaspreet (Canada), November 21, 2012, 5:25 AM.

I believe I would have been a sant- or baba-groupie today, possibly a very committed one like some of the people I grew up with, had it not been for my father. He went from being a violent atheist who would beat my mother up for doing her nitnem, to a very violent sant-follower. I was on the receiving end of the violence once when my behaviour was seen as that of a "brodi's" (I had other plans, to attend the program at the local gurdwara my friend was lecturing at when the sant showed up in the next town and I was expected to just go there without question). A gun was loaded and put in my hand and my father shouted at me to shoot him. I wouldn't, so he slapped me a few times, banged my head against the wall, and said a lot of nasty stuff and then threatened to blow his brains out in front of me though he had no intention of doing so, of course. That was the turning point for me, I think. By my later teens I really resented having to bow down to the sant, even his empty chair, if he wasn't in it. I really started hating the sant and the gurdwara they went to worship him at. Yet I was still a coward who felt too scared not to go and not to bow to their sant. I made my stance when I was 19 or 20 not to bow when taken there by my father when he came to visit me at the university. I wasn't sure if there would be violence or not, but I felt I would despise myself if I bowed to a human being. Fortunately, there was no violence. He didn't even make a comment. Today he has no say over my religiosity and I tell him to mind his business if he preaches about praying and stuff or asks if I do any nitnem. Yes, maybe I am biased, but I think it is dangerous for any people to be so inclined to following sants. Any anti-Sikh interest can groom people to be sants, set them up, and give them financial support to brainwash people with anti-Sikh beliefs and fragment our community further. At the same time, I don't think one can just make people stop believing in sants. Maybe the goal should be for a more rigorous standard for sants to be thrown out to the people. I find it scary that there are so many charlatan sants. One would think it would be a rare thing for someone to be a sant. I hear the Catholic church only allows dead people to be made into saints. I wonder if the Jews have any and what they would do to control a huge mushrooming of people claiming to be sants. Well, they do have these rabbis who run their own cults. Having said all this, I don't think people should just follow missionaries blindly either. They too contain charlatans with black hearts with anti-Sikh interests (I know one), who don't care about the Sikh community and would try to damage it in a moment. I don't think the Sikh faith was ever meant for the people to be ignorant about their leaders, be they sant or anyone else.

18: Gurmukh Singh (London, United Kingdom), November 21, 2012, 6:36 AM.

For those who cause such disturbances, the message through the UK Sikh media this time has been loud and clear: that while the law will take its own course, such behaviour will not be accepted by the sangats in future. Study of gurmat and Sikh tradition needs systematic research (khoj) by young Sikhs over a period of time, and should be undertaken in humility. There are no shortcuts. A Sikh is a "Sikh" for life. My suggestions in a related item regarding professional parcharaks, elsewhere, are as follows: All parcharaks should be vetted by gurdwara managements before inviting them over from abroad: for their belief in the twin institution of "Guru Granth and Guru Panth", the "Jyot" and "Jugat" division of the Guru by the final command of Guru Gobind Singh ji. Both, the Jyot Guru, Guru Granth Sahib, and Jugat Guru, residing in Guru Khalsa Panth, have no rivals (shareeks). Any parcharak preaching otherwise must not be allowed on gurdwara stages. Any parcharak preaching 'bipran ki reet', i.e. promoting Brahmanical type of superstition and ritualism, or promoting deras and gurudoms, is also defying gurmat and our Gurus ('jabb eh gahay bipran ki reet ...'), and should have no claim to gurdwara stages. In addition, it is not advisable to invite a parcharak who can cause controversy due to strongly held public views about certain issues, which have been ring-fenced by Akal Takht Sahib, e.g. Dasam Granth, Raag Mala, etc. A UK panel of gursikhs can be appointed for the purpose of vetting "controversial" parcharaks referred to it. This dharmik panel would have continual direct two way communication with Akal Takht Sahib. (Can also be mutually beneficial regarding panthic decisions.)

19: Baldev Singh (Bradford, United Kingdom), November 21, 2012, 6:57 AM.

A simple message to all gurdwaras: zero tolerance for violence and bad behaviour on gurdwara premises. Maybe we need our women to take leadership, if the men are having difficulty in doing the job.

20: Jaggi Singh (Sarnia,Ontario, Canada.), November 21, 2012, 9:04 AM.

Sarabhjit Singh is a beacon, a light-house, which has been very dim for far too long. The sanghis have side-lined Prof. Darshan Singh, and have now turned their vicious attacks on Sarabhjit. I wish Iqbal Singh would have named the ring leaders and their organizations, that way the real Sikhs would stop attending their phoney gurdwaras and the talibans would feel the pain where it hurts: their coffers and pockets. I commend Jaspreet for sharing his/her very painful childhood experience. And yes, Jaspreet, a Sikh bows only to Guru Granth Sahib, and NOT to any living baba or sant, his picture or any other granth.

21: Baljit Singh Pelia (Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.), November 21, 2012, 11:08 AM.

A very successful and basic strategy from the very beginning of politics and warfare has been to disunite a distinctive and unified powerful group or nation by sowing seeds of dissent or suspicion to form two or more disparate groups. Having thus been weakened and without any physical intervention by the outside powers, the two groups will collide and eventually terminate each other as well as the cause, no matter how high and noble. Here we have a perfect example of this clash of thoughts in play. Throw them an imaginative bone of contention and see how the Guru's Sikhs and Khalsas turn from saints and lions into a frenzied bunch of hyenas devouring their very own. One group insisting on the high value of the scriptures that undoubtedly contain the prose and poetry of the Dashmesh, albeit clumped together, unintentionally and inadvertently, without any guidance or approval by the Akal Takht or the Sarbat Khalsa, under one binding along with the Gurmukhi translations of a multitude of literary and some vulgar as well as indecent works of the sub-continent. The intention here was, as protectors of the nation, to catalog and safeguard the ancient literature from destruction by the then Mughal rulers of the subcontinent. What better way to safeguard their existence than to bind them together with the gurbani of Guru Gobind Singh. A group of well meaning but ultra religious firebrand young Sikhs have been lead to believe that by rejecting the Dasam Granth, the Sikhs will ultimately end up denying the scriptures of the Dashmesh, and they are right. We are in a catch twenty-two situation, if we reject outright the Dasam Granth we invalidate the bani of Guru Gobind Singh. On the other hand, if we accept this compilation as sacred, we muddy the core of our faith by validating a bunch of inappropriate and vulgar literature that simply has no place in any religion, much less in Sikhism. On the other side of this controversy are the more liberal adherents of the faith, allowing Sikhi to flow and evolve with the changing world, from Guru Nanak's school of thought of purism, designed to unite the world under a universalist banner and Guru Gobind Singh's affirmation to take control of one's destiny, they have become mere spectators simply willing to adhere to the changing times, interpretations and circumstances. Many amongst this group despise and blame the spirited ones and their orthodox approach of intolerance. For letting things get to this point of divisions and the emergence of sectarian groups mushrooming all over as Nirankaris, ravidasias and radhasoamis and various others. Yet amongst these liberals are the ones that are the followers of these divisive sant and dera greups. It is interesting to observe that many of the disputed objects were insignificant while they were being created. For example look at the history behind the compilation of the Dasam Granth, or the facelifts of the many historical gurdwaras that merely wiped out the basis and associated historical objects of significance attached to their existence. On the other hand, you can see the emergence of new, totally insignificant, unverified and illogical places of pilgrimage such as Hem Kunt being given undue importance with the sole objective of distracting the Sikh nation away from their real heritage that is across the border, so close and so important yet unreachable, not as an afterthought or by circumstance but rather by design. One needs to notice that the solution to this and other issues is to simply appoint a group of Sikh scholars to identify the legitimate and authentic bani of Guru Gobind Singh and present it in the form of a pothi and validating this by a hukamnama from the Akal Takht as well as the four Takhts. Yet, here we are part-time, week-end Sikhs drawing up the lines, trying to impose our views on one another with dreadful results and maligning our sacred places of worship. Until an issue has been thought through and a solution presented, we must avoid controversy and clash. Instead, we collectively should impress and implore upon the scholars and institutions on their role to come together to debate and provide a venue for such deliberations by publishing a date and place. This would achieve four objectives: One of putting to rest any controversial and divisive issues, secondly of authenticating and verifying the legitimate bani of Guru Gobind Singh, third of legitimizing our institutions, and fourth, the most important, of defeating the nefarious designs of a covert and stealthy enemy hellbent upon the destruction of our religion by sponsoring and seeding such controversies.

22: Sarjit Kaur (Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.), November 21, 2012, 3:20 PM.

Guru Gobind Singh's final message was: "Guru manyo Granth," so why are we listening to mortals, et al, instead of letting our souls taking the natural course of absorbing gurshabad and naam. Gurdwaras thus should only indulge in gurshabad and naam, and nothing else. No wonder, I never like to sit through a gurdwara katha, lecture, etc., but only enjoy listening to gurbani, eat in langar, and leave ... this is a simple opinion of a simpleton.

23: Sukhdave (Alor Star, Kedah, Malaysia (Currently in Beijing)), November 21, 2012, 6:39 PM.

Looks like we still have a long way to go to learn how to 'agree to disagree'. However I am glad that we are already moving in this direction ...

24: Dharamveer Singh (Mumbai, India), November 21, 2012, 9:36 PM.

I have read most of the comments and find considerable logic and reason in Baljit Singh Pelia's comments. I don't know who this Sarabjit Singh is but it seems most of you have been enlightened by his views. I wonder if Preachers like Gyani Maskeen ji also faced such protests.

25: Dharamveer Singh (Mumbai, India), November 22, 2012, 9:15 PM.

I suggest Prof Sarabhjit Singh will do more good in focusing on highlighting the meaning and import of what's in the Guru Granth Sahib, and not by giving importance or publicity to charlatans who have their personal agendas.

26: Gurinder Singh (Stockton, California, USA), November 23, 2012, 6:43 AM.

Does Prof Sarbhjit Singh reject the authenticity of "Jaap Sahib"? I ask because that would amount to rejecting the Amrit ceremony!

27: Sarjit Kaur (Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.), November 24, 2012, 1:09 PM.

I would like to add that there are many beautiful shabads in the Dasam Granth, so it is disheartening that highly educated Sikhs condemn those who defend Dasam bani, and also refer to bani of Dasam Granth as lewd. Unbelievable that such a derogatory word is used by Sikhs. And calling your own fellow Sikhs Taliban? What confuses me is if you are all so highly brilliant and educated, why can't you decipher the meaning of Guru Granth Sahib with translations easily available online, and various translations readily available in hard copy?

28: Gurinder Singh (Stockton, California, USA), November 25, 2012, 6:46 AM.

Very nicely put by Sarjit Kaur ji above. I have studied the Dasam Granth in its entirety and the message is absolutely in line with Sikh teachings. Charitropakhayan is a complex subject that teaches Khalsa to avoid moral pitfalls by telling stories of lust-bitten individuals. I wish those who criticize it will read it and try to understand it first.

29: Hardeep Jessy (Penang, Malaysia), November 27, 2012, 7:05 AM.

Sarabhjit Singh ji, please come to Malaysia. We'd love to hear your views. To the donkeys who tried to stop him - it's called intellectual discourse! Oh, but you wouldn't understand it, would you, now?

30: Jawinder Kaur (United Kingdom), January 21, 2014, 6:01 AM.

Prof. Sarbjit Singh ji: May God bless you. I listen to you on the Internet. I salute you.

Comment on "Who's Afraid of Sarabhjit Singh Dhunda?"









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.