Current Events
How the 'Face of Terrorism' May be Allowed to Further Terrorize
by MALLIKA KAUR
While relatively few are engaged in euphoric celebration on the streets, and fewer still in serious analysis about the legality of the assassination itself, most Americans (and indeed people the world over) have been watching bin Laden flash on their TV screens since May 2.
Indeed, this turbaned and bearded
face had become synonymous with terrorism since 9/11.
But the last time this ‘face' of terrorism flashed on TV screens incessantly, several communities that bore outward and even minimal resemblance to bin Laden began to suffer ... gravely. And, to be sure, this suffering had still not subsided by May Day 2011.
Now, it runs the risk of
multiplying.
Sikh, Muslim, South Asian, Arab, and other Middle
Eastern communities in the United States have borne the brunt of
mistaken identities and misplaced hatred since 9/11.
And despite
strong coalition-building between various minority and non-minority
groups, despite strides towards solidarity and sanity, the mistrust and
hate were far from over in the United States:
â–º As indicated in this video,
this past February Muslim families attending a homeless shelter
fundraising dinner were verbally assaulted by a few hundred protesters
who yelled religious epithets at the "terrorists" and asking the young
children, women, and men to "go back home" and "never forget 9/11," even
as the protesters proclaimed with fervor, "No Sharia."
â–º In March, in California's capital city, two elderly, turbaned Sikh men, out for a walk, were gunned down in what is widely believed to be a hate crime. Both died.
In his televised remarks on Sunday, President Barack Obama asked us to "think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11," though conceding that he knows "it has, at times, frayed."
But now,
when images of terrorists with turbans and beards are once against
flooding TV screens, one wishes he would elaborate on the "fraying."
That he would elaborate on how Americans can truly illustrate that "the
United States is not at war with Islam" (and anything ‘Islam-like.')
That he would explain that, of the American people who "did not choose
this fight," some were twice afflicted - by external threats like all
others, and by internal threats from some others. And that he would warn
the nation against succumbing to such ignorance once again.
The
responsibility to protect against backlash has thus far not been
fulfilled by the government or by the media. No one has made the
statement that bin Laden is the ‘face of terror' because of his
terrorist acts, not because of his turban or beard.
Does such a statement seem too obvious?
Not
to the families who worry not only about retaliatory attacks and global
ramifications of bin Laden's assassination, but also about
re-victimization by their own neighbors. Not to those who wonder whether
the ‘Hey Osama, go home' slurs will increase or decrease in
middle-school playgrounds. Not to the family of Balbir Singh Sodhi, who
was murdered in a hate crime on September 15, 2001, and whose family
recently had to spearhead a campaign against Arizona politicians seeking to remove his name from the 9/11 victims' memorial.
It is about time that all those informing public opinion recall the lessons learnt since 9/11 and begin stating the painfully obvious.
[Courtesy: IntLawGrrls]
May 10, 2011